Strongly agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Overall evaluation | ||||
1. The semi-flipped classes are interesting and attractive | 59 | 12 | 23 | |
2. A pile of teaching content was present | 42 | 28 | 24 | |
3. The lectures clearly explain difficult points | 46 | 24 | 22 | 2 |
4. The video course summarises the textbook knowledge | 72 | 11 | 11 | |
5. It is enlightening for in-depth study | 30 | 32 | 30 | 2 |
6. It links theory with clinic practice tightly | 68 | 25 | 1 | |
Evaluation of each chapter | ||||
7. The chapter ‘oral bullous disease’ helped me to quickly seek common clinical features while reserving differences | 60 | 21 | 13 | |
8. The chapter ‘oral allergic disease’ helped me to memorise knowledge points efficiently and form knowledge networks | 61 | 26 | 7 | |
9. The chapter ‘oral ulcerous diseases’ helped me to extend textbook knowledge | 66 | 20 | 8 | |
10. The chapter ‘oral patches stria diseases’ contributed significantly to enlivening the classroom atmosphere and increase teacher–student interaction | 58 | 23 | 13 | |
11. The chapter “lip and tongue disease” helped me to learn about an abstract disease, burning mouth syndrome, which has no visible mucosal lesions | 63 | 26 | 5 | |
12. The chapter ‘introduction of clinical thinking’ had instructive value in clinical practice | 70 | 23 | 1 |