Table 5 Comparison of results of questionnaire B between group A und group B at t3 (end of winter term, third interview)
Group A(PRISM, n = 18) | Group B(numeric scale, n = 18) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
The interview was helpful for me to self-reflect my competencies regarding the following issues (0 = not helpful – 10 = very helpful) | |||
Theoretical knowledge (mv ± sd) | 7.50 ± 1.15 | 6.13 ± 1.86 | 0.02* |
Practical skills (mv ± sd) | 7.44 ± 1.31 | 6.13 ± 2.16 | 0.04* |
Interests (mv ± sd) | 7.38 ± 1.86 | 7.06 ± 1.57 | 0.50* |
Further need of education (mv ± sd) | 7.87 ± 1.02 | 6.88 ± 1.93 | 0.11* |
Reaching the course objectives (mv ± sd) | 7.56 ± 1.26 | 6.63 ± 2.31 | 0.34* |
Will you draw personal consequences from the interview? (%) | 87.5 | 75.0 | 0.65** |
How much do you agree with the following statements (0 = not at all – 10 = completely)? | |||
The interview was appropriate for self-reflection (mv ± sd) | 8.06 ± 0.68 | 7.00 ± 1.59 | 0.04* |
The used instrument is appropriate for self-reflection (mv ± sd) | 8.37 ± 0.89 | 6.44 ± 2.10 | 0.01* |
How high do you rate (0 = very low – 10 = very high)? | |||
… the benefit of the combination of interview and instrument (mv ± sd) | 8.69 ± 0.70 | 7.25 ± 1.57 | 0.01* |