Table 4 Comparison of results of questionnaire B between group A und group B at t2 (after 6 weeks, second interview)
Group A (PRISM, n = 18) | Group B (numeric scale, n = 18) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
The interview was helpful for me to self-reflect my competencies regarding the following issues (0 = not helpful – 10 = very helpful) | |||
Theoretical knowledge (mv ± sd) | 7.94 ± 1.18 | 6.75 ± 1.63 | 0.01* |
Practical skills (mv ± sd) | 8.25 ± 1.00 | 6.38 ± 1.96 | 0.01* |
Interests (mv ± sd) | 8.13 ± 1.31 | 7.12 ± 1.75 | 0.07* |
Further need of education (mv ± sd) | 7.87 ± 1.50 | 7.56 ± 1.41 | 0.43* |
Reaching the course objectives (mv ± sd) | 8.13 ± 1.02 | 6.44 ± 2.25 | 0.04* |
Will you draw personal consequences from the interview? (%) | 93.8 | 75.0 | 0.33** |
How much do you agree with the following statements (0 = not at all – 10 = completely)? | |||
The interview was appropriate for self-reflection (mv ± sd) | 8.19 ± 1.22 | 6.81 ± 1.97 | 0.04* |
The used instrument is appropriate for self-reflection (mv ± sd) | 8.25 ± 1.06 | 6.63 ± 2.03 | 0.01* |
How high do you rate (0 = very low – 10 = very high)? | |||
… the benefit of the combination of interview and instrument (mv ± sd) | 8.69 ± 1.08 | 7.37 ± 1.86 | 0.02* |