Table 3 Comparison of results of questionnaire B between group A und group B at t1 after the first interview
Group A (PRISM, n = 18) | Group B (numeric scale, n = 18) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
The interview was helpful for me to self-reflect my competencies regarding the following issues (0 = not helpful – 10 = very helpful) | |||
Theoretical knowledge (mv ± sd) | 7.38 ± 1.63 | 6.88 ± 1.86 | 0.49* |
Practical skills (mv ± sd) | 7.69 ± 1.54 | 6.50 ± 1.79 | 0.04* |
Interests (mv ± sd) | 7.31 ± 1.49 | 6.69 ± 2.60 | 0.70* |
Further need of education (mv ± sd) | 8.06 ± 1.84 | 7.31 ± 1.58 | 0.14* |
Reaching the course objectives (mv ± sd) | 7.31 ± 1.70 | 6.63 ± 1.86 | 0.22* |
Will you draw personal consequences from the interview? (%) | 93.3 | 75.0 | 0.33** |
How much do you agree with the following statements (0 = not at all – 10 = completely)? | |||
The interview was appropriate for self-reflection (mv ± sd) | 7.81 ± 1.52 | 6.50 ± 1.86 | 0.04* |
The used instrument is appropriate for self-reflection (mv ± sd) | 8.19 ± 1.28 | 6.56 ± 2.19 | 0.02* |
How high do you rate (0 = very low – 10 = very high)? | |||
… the benefit of the combination of interview and instrument (mv ± sd) | 8.50 ± 1.10 | 7.31 ± 1.70 | 0.03* |