Table 4 Satisfaction survey on the assessment of resident standard training in department of prosthodontics [n (%)]
Investigated items | Very satisfied | Satisfied | Not satisfied | Very dissatisfied | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG | NPG | PG | NPG | PG | NPG | PG | NPG | |
① Whether they are satisfied with the training plan and assessment | 25(92.59%) | 20 (68.97%) | 2(7.41%) | 9(31.03%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
② Whether they are satisfied with supervisor’s teaching ability (responsibility, theory, operation, problem, and solving ability) | 26(96.30%) | 26(89.66%) | 1(3.70%) | 3(10.34%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
③ Whether the assessors can give a practical, objective, fair assessment and regularly provide face-to-face feedback on performance in each test | 27(100%) | 28 (96.55%) | 0 | 1(3.45%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
④ Whether supervisors can conduct targeted guidance according to the feedback results of assessment | 27 (100%) | 27 (93.10%) | 0 | 2 (6.90%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
⑤ Whether the department attaches importance to this training and regularly organizes discussion of medical cases and professional skills learning | 25 (92.59%) | 27(93.10%) | 2(7.41%) | 2 (6.90%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
⑥ Whether they are satisfied with the improvement of their practical ability after the end of training | 27(100%) | 20(68.97%) | 0 | 9(31.03%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |