Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: eOSCE stations live versus remote evaluation and scores variability

Original Submission
4 Aug 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Sep 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Sep 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Möltner
5 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Donia Bouzid
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Donia Bouzid
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
12 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Donia Bouzid
Resubmission - Version 7
12 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Möltner
30 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Donia Bouzid
Resubmission - Version 8
30 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
1 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Donia Bouzid
Resubmission - Version 9
1 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 9
2 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Donia Bouzid
Resubmission - Version 10
2 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 10
14 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Möltner
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
23 Nov 2022 Editorially accepted
13 Dec 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12909-022-03919-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page