Table 3 Global rating scores (GRS) in post-test per assessment modality
Group ACTY n (%) | Group C n (%) | Group P n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
GRS on CBDs | |||
Does not meet expectations | 2 (3.4) | 4 (11.1) | 0 (0) |
Borderline | 7 (12.1) | 7 (19.4) | 2 (6.5) |
Meets expectations | 49 (84.5) | 25 (69.4) | 29 (93.5) |
Pie chart (%) |
|
|
|
GRS on OSCEs | |||
Does not meet expectations | 12 (7.4) | 12 (13.2) | 4 (4.9) |
Borderline | 25 (15.3) | 27 (29.7) | 15 (18.5) |
Meets expectations | 126 (77.3) | 52 (57.1) | 62 (76.5) |
Pie chart (%) |
|
|
|
GRS on Simulations | |||
Does not meet expectations | 18 (22.5) | 14 (33.3) | 4 (7.8) |
Borderline | 25 (31.3) | 17 (40.5) | 10 (19.6) |
Meets expectations | 37 (46.3) | 11 (26.2) | 37 (72.5) |
Pie chart (%) |
|
|
|
-
- Frequency of scores, per group type. Pie charts showing relative occurrence of global rating scores on CBDs, OSCEs, simulations
- ACTY Acute Care Transitional Year, C Student comparison group, P PNIT comparison group. CBD Case-based discussion, OSCE Objective structured clinical examination. Because each participant did more than one station per modality, n refers the respective score frequency
