Peer Review reports
From: Evaluation of the quality of multiple-choice questions according to the students’ academic level
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Jul 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Sep 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 22 Sep 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John C McLachlan |
| 5 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Mercedes Iñarrairaegui |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John C McLachlan |
| 14 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 14 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Mercedes Iñarrairaegui |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 30 Oct 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Nov 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-022-03844-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.