Skip to main content

Table 1 Items related to nonverbal and verbal communication delineated for the three groups and investigation of possible significant group differences

From: Online student tutorials for effective peer teaching in digital times: a longitudinal quantitative study

Items

Medical student (groups 1)

Tutor (group 2)

Simulated patient (group 3)

Group difference

The student …

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

p

Scheffé

had eye contact

4.54

0.90

4.10

0.70

4.88

0.35

> .05

-

had a straight posture to signal that the issue is serious

4.38

0.94

4.05

0.81

4.75

0.71

> .05

-

used non-verbal cues, and used them deliberately

4.41

0.77

3.90

0.83

4.88

0.35

= .029

= .010

1-2

2-3

delivered relevant information in an understandable way

4.71

0.69

4.14

0.85

4.75

0.46

= .005

1-2

recognised the patient’s feelings based on nonverbal cues

4.20

0.86

3.76

1.09

4.63

0.52

> .05

 

responded adequately to patient’s nonverbal and verbal cues

4.11

0.81

3.86

0.85

4.75

0.46

= .025

2-3

adapted their tone of voice appropriately to the situation

4.53

0.70

4.00

0.71

4.63

0.52

= .008

1-2

used their facial expressions adequately

4.28

0.86

3.95

0.81

4.88

0.35

= .024

2-3

used their gestures adequately

3.79

1.11

3.57

1.21

4.88

0.35

= .015

= .027

1-3

2-3

was distracted or preoccupied with other things

1.54

1.11

1.43

0.81

1.0

0.0

> .05

-