Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A randomized controlled trial of simulation training in teaching coronary angiographic views

Original Submission
29 Oct 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Issam Tanoubi
20 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Julia H. Indik
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Julia H. Indik
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Julia H. Indik
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Issam Tanoubi
4 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Julia H. Indik
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Julia H. Indik
Resubmission - Version 7
10 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
2 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Julia H. Indik
Resubmission - Version 8
2 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
16 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
17 Aug 2022 Editorially accepted
26 Aug 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12909-022-03705-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page