Skip to main content

Table 2 Features of professional working context and personal demographics of the 228 MERIT survey respondents

From: Mentoring is in the ‘I’ of the beholder: supporting mentors in reflecting on their actual and preferred way of mentoring

Variable

No. of respondents (% of 228)

Initial training of mentor

 Medicine

121 (53.1%)

 Educational Sciences

41 (18.0%)

 Health Sciences

35 (15.4%)

 Psychology

24 (10.5%)

 Biomedical Sciences

18 (7.9%)

 Basic Sciences

13 (5.7%)

 Social Sciences

10 (4.4%)

 Allied Health Professions

8 (3.5%)

 Public Health

6 (2.6%)

 Nursing Sciences

2 (0.9%)

 Pharmacy

2 (0.9%)

 Other

22 (9.6%)

Current main profession

 Physician

81 (35.5%)

 Researcher

45 (19.7%)

 Teacher/Educator

42 (18.4%)

 Educationalist

23 (10.1%)

 PhD Candidate

16 (7.0%)

 Basic Scientist

5(2.2%)

 Other

16 (7.0%)

Educational Program in which mentor mentors

 Medicine

137 (60.1%)

 Health Sciences

33 (14.5%)

 Educational Sciences

22 (9.6%)

 Biomedical Sciences

19 (8.3%)

 Allied Health Professions

5 (2.2%)

 Pharmacy

2 (0.9%)

 Public Health

1 (0.4%)

 Dentistry

1 (0.4%)

 Other

8 (3.5%)

Country in which mentor mentors (per continent)

 Europe

168 (73.3%)

 North America

43 (18.9%)

 Australia

8 (3.5%)

 Asia

6 (2.6%)

 Africa

3 (1.3%)

Years of mentoring experience a

 0–5

99 (43.4%)

 6–10

64 (28.1%)

 11–15

31 (13.6%)

 16–20

14 (6.1%)

 21–25

13 (5.7%)

 26–30

7 (3.1%)

 31–35

2 (0.9%)

 36–40

1 (0.4%)

 41–45

0 (0.0%)

 46–50

0 (0.0%)

 51–55

0 (0.0%)

 56–60

1 (0.4%)

Mentor assesses mentee

 Yes

180 (78.9%)

 No

41 (18.0%)

 Don’t know

7 (3.1%)

  1. a For the sake of brevity, this variable is shown in categorical units. It is analyzed as a continuous variable