Peer Review reports
From: Is checklist an effective tool for teaching research students? A survey-based study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 11 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rintaro Imafuku |
| 12 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joy Y. Balta |
| 27 May 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Nguyen Tien Huy |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 May 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 31 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rintaro Imafuku |
| 18 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Nguyen Tien Huy |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Nguyen Tien Huy |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 22 Jun 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rintaro Imafuku |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 30 Jun 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Jul 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-022-03632-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.