Skip to main content

Table 4 Perceptive feedback of participants to their teaching method

From: Utility of 3D printed models as adjunct in acetabular fracture teaching for Orthopaedic trainees

No

Feedback questions

Group 1—lecture group

(median)

Group 2—3D model group

(median)

p value

1

This method teaches clinically relevant anatomy

2

1

0.10

2

This method accurately depicts acetabular fracture types

2

1

0.10

3

This method improved 3D spatial comprehension of acetabular fractures

2

1

0.40

4

This method improves Xray interpretation

2

1

0.26

5

This method helps to improve CT scan interpretation

3

2

0.19

6

This method helps to better learn acetabular fracture classification

2

1

0.31

7

This method helps to understand surgical approach

3

1

0.05

8

This method helps to understand fracture reduction and surgical fixation

3

1

0.12

9

I would use this method to prepare for acetabular surgery

2

1

0.10

10

This method should be extended to teach other fractures

3

1

0.03

  1. based on ‘likert’ scale of 1–5 (1 – strongly agree, 2 – agree, 3 – neutral, 4 – disagree and 5 – strongly disagree)