Table 3 Comparison for improvement in correct identification of fracture type during the pre-test and post-test between groups
From: Utility of 3D printed models as adjunct in acetabular fracture teaching for Orthopaedic trainees
| Â | Elementary fractures (5 simple) | Associated fractures (5 complex) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Pre-test | Post-test | % improvement (p value) | Pre-test | Post-test | % improvement (p value) |
Group 1 (n = 40*) | 11 | 19 | 20% (p = 0.10) | 8 | 16 | 20% (p = 0.04) |
Group 2 (n = 40*) | 13 | 29 | 40% (p = 0.04) | 10 | 24 | 35% (p = 0.03) |