Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparing computer-assisted learning activities for learning clinical neuroscience: a randomized control trial

Original Submission
24 Dec 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
5 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patcharin Panjaburee
26 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kiran Kasper Rajan
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kiran Kasper Rajan
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kiran Kasper Rajan
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kiran Kasper Rajan
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kiran Kasper Rajan
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
4 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kiran Kasper Rajan
Resubmission - Version 7
23 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
30 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
23 Jun 2022 Editorially accepted
3 Jul 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12909-022-03578-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page