Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of self versus expert-assisted feedback for cricothyroidotomy training: a randomized trial

Original Submission
12 Dec 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hasan Aldinc
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hasan Aldinc
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hasan Aldinc
Resubmission - Version 4
6 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hasan Aldinc
Resubmission - Version 5
9 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hasan Aldinc
Resubmission - Version 6
16 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hasan Aldinc
Resubmission - Version 7
23 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
30 May 2022 Editorially accepted
14 Jun 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12909-022-03519-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page