Skip to main content

Table 2 GNSs’ final clinical practicum experiences of the NT cooperation, and the CLE and supervision

From: The nurse teacher’s pedagogical cooperation with students, the clinical learning environment and supervision in clinical practicum: a European cross-sectional study of graduating nursing students

 

Total

n

Mean (SD) range

Finland

n

Mean(SD)

range

Germany

n

Mean (SD) range

Iceland

n

Mean (SD) range

Ireland

n

Mean (SD) range

Lithuania

n

Mean (SD) range

Spain

n

Mean (SD)

range

p-value

Cronbach’s α

The nurse teacher’s pedagogical cooperation with students

823

3.9 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

269

3.8 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

88

3.8 (0.9)

1.6-5.0

36

4.0 (0.6)

2.8-5.0

99

3.7 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

187

4.0 (0.8)

1.6-5.0

144

4.3 (0.8)

1.4-5.0

< 0.0001a

0.88

Individual supervision

823

4.2 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

269

4.3 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

88

4.1 (0.9)

2.0-5.0

36

4.2 (0.6)

3.0-5.0

99

4.0 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

85

4.3 (0.8)

2.0-5.0

144

4.4 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

< 0.0001b

0.85

Relieving stress

821

4.1 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

269

4.1 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

88

3.9 (0.9)

2.0-5.0

36

4.2 (0.6)

3.0-5.0

99

3.9 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

86

4.2 (0.9)

2.0-5.0

143

4.4 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

< 0.0001b

0.85

Promoting learning

822

4.0 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

269

3.8 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

88

3.9 (1.1)

1.0-5.0

36

4.1 (0.8)

2.0-5.0

99

3.8 (1.1)

1.0-5.0

85

4.0 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

143

4.3 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

< 0.0001b

0.83

Teacher’s response time

821

3.5 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

269

3.2 (1.3)

1.0-5.0

87

3.3 (1.1)

1.0-5.0

36

3.5 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

99

3.5 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

85

3.8 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

143

3.9 (1.1)

1.0-5.0

< 0.0001b

0.85

Ease of cooperation

819

3.7(1.2)

1.0-5.0

269

3.5 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

88

3.7 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

36

3.9 (1.3)

2.0-5.0

99

3.1 (1.3)

1.0-5.0

87

3.8 (1.2)

1.0-5.0

143

4.3 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

< 0.0001b

0.87

Cronbach’s α

0.86

0.86

0.88

0.85

0.91

0.87

0.89

  

The learning environment and the content of the supervisory relationship

 Pedagogical atmosphere

1607

4.0 (0.8)

1.0-5.0

480

4.1 (0.8)

1.0-5.0

299

3.7 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

48

3.9 (0.6)

2.3-5.0

358

3.9 (0.8)

1.2-5.0

259

4.0 (0.8)

1.0-5.0

163

4.2 (0.8)

1.4-5.0

< 0.0001a

0.84

 Leadership style of the ward manager (WM)

1603

3.9 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

479

3.8 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

299

3.6 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

47

4.0 (0.9)

2.0-5.0

357

4.0 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

258

4.0 (0.8)

1.0-5.0

163

3.9 (1.0)

1.0-5.0

< 0.0001a

0.85

 Nursing care on the ward

1603

3.9 (0.8)

1.0-5.0

478

3.9 (0.8)

1.0-5.0

300

3.4 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

47

4.0 (0.7)

2.3-5.0

357

3.9 (0.8)

1.3-5.0

258

4.1 (0.8)

1.5-5.0

163

4.2 (0.7)

2.0-5.0

< 0.0001a

0.85

 The content of the supervisory relationship

1598

4.0 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

478

4.2 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

297

3.8 (1.1)

1.0-5.0

47

4.2 (0.6)

2.4-5.0

356

3.9 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

257

4.1 (0.8)

1.0-5.0

163

4.3 (0.9)

1.0-5.0

< 0.0001a

0.84

 Total meanc

1648

4.0 (0.7)

1.1-5.0

514

4.1 (0.7)

1.1-5.0

302

3.7 (0.8)

1.2-5.0

48

4.0 (0.6)

2.9-5.0

362

3.9 (0.7)

1.1-5.0

259

4.1 (0.7)

1.1-5.0

163

4.2 (0.7)

1.8-5.0

< 0.0001a

0.96

  1. A five-point Likert scale from 1 (fully disagree) to 5 (fully agree) was used
  2. GNSs Graduation nursing students, NT Nurse teacher, CLE Clinical learning environment, SD Standard deviation
  3. a p-values are calculated between countries using a Chi-square test
  4. bp-values are calculated between countries using a Kruskall-Wallis test
  5. cTotal mean consists of CLES+T scale, where the original T -subscale is replaced with a T -cooperation subscale