Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Perspectives of general practitioners towards their supervisors over the past ten years in China

Original Submission
5 Oct 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Oct 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Dec 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose Augusto Simoes
14 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qiaoli Su
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qiaoli Su
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qiaoli Su
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qiaoli Su
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qiaoli Su
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qiaoli Su
Resubmission - Version 7
27 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
19 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qiaoli Su
Resubmission - Version 8
23 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
25 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qiaoli Su
Resubmission - Version 9
25 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
27 Apr 2022 Editorially accepted
31 May 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12909-022-03442-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page