From: Mentoring in palliative medicine in the time of covid-19: a systematic scoping review
 | Evaluation Criteria | References |
---|---|---|
1 | Pre-mentoring Stage | |
1.1 | Mentor, near-peer and mentee training | [110] |
1.2 | Establishment of overall mentoring structure, process, guidelines, codes of conduct and standards of practice | |
1.3 | Formal matching process | [110] |
2 | Mentoring Process | |
2.1 | Communication | Â |
2.1.1 | Frequency of communication | |
2.1.2 | Usability and accessibility of in-person and online communication platforms | |
2.2 | Mentees’ and mentors’ adherence to guidelines and codes of conduct | |
2.3 | Mentees’ and mentors’ active participation in mentoring activities | |
3 | Post-mentoring Stage | |
3.1 | Mentees’ and mentors’ quality of performance, assignments and projects | |
3.2 | Improvements in patient care and safety | |
4 | Criteria relevant to more than one stage | |
4.1 | Host Organisation | Â |
4.1.1 | Oversight over mentoring programs | [110] |
4.1.2 | Provision of financial, administrative, logistical, technical and medico-legal support | [110] |
4.2 | Mentors/Near-Peer Mentors | Â |
4.2.1 | Experiences as senior or near-peer mentors | |
4.3 | Mentoring Relationships | Â |
4.3.1 | Open, trusted and authentic relationships | |
4.3.2 | Fulfilment of previously agreed goals, expectations, timelines, codes of conduct and roles and responsibilities within the mentoring relationship | |
4.3.3 | Overall satisfaction of mentors, near-peers and mentees with mentoring relationships | |
4.3.4 | Mutual appreciation | |
4.4 | Growth of Mentors, Near-Peers and Mentees | Â |
4.4.1 | Personal growth | [20, 30, 85, 95,96,97, 100, 107, 108, 110, 111, 115, 122, 126, 130, 131, 136, 144, 149, 158, 164] |
4.4.2 | Professional and career development | [30, 96, 99, 100, 110,111,112, 122, 127, 129, 131, 136, 144, 152, 158, 164] |
4.5 | Evaluating the Assessments Used | Â |
4.5.1 | Evaluation of the inherent biases, subjectivity and reliability of self-assessments | [124] |
4.5.2 | Evaluation of the validity of existing instruments used for assessment |