Peer Review reports
From: What works in appraisal meetings for newly graduated doctors? – and what doesn’t?
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 May 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
24 Aug 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Harris |
20 Sep 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karin Isaksson Ro |
31 Jan 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Kleis Møller |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Kleis Møller |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Kleis Møller |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
24 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Kleis Møller |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
24 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Harris |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
7 Apr 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Apr 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-022-03357-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.