Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Script concordance test acceptability and utility for assessing medical students’ clinical reasoning: a user’s survey and an institutional prospective evaluation of students’ scores

Original Submission
28 May 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jul 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louis Sibert
1 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Daniel KÜN-DARBOIS
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Daniel KÜN-DARBOIS
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Daniel KÜN-DARBOIS
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Daniel KÜN-DARBOIS
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
6 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Daniel KÜN-DARBOIS
Resubmission - Version 7
18 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Daniel KÜN-DARBOIS
Resubmission - Version 8
28 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
30 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Daniel KÜN-DARBOIS
Resubmission - Version 9
30 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
1 Apr 2022 Editorially accepted
13 Apr 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12909-022-03339-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page