CSI Core Principle | Survey Item (survey of origin) | Percentage of respondents (%) | Responses (n) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | Agree | Somewhat agree | Somewhat disagree | Disagree | Strongly Disagree | |||
Patient-centred learning | The cases encouraged me to relate to the patient at hand (survey B) | 12.5 | 48.2 | 28.6 | 7.1 | 3.6 | 0.00 | 56 |
60.7 | 35.7 | 3.6 | ||||||
Integration of clinical and scientific content | The cases encouraged me to integrate knowledge and skills from different areas (survey B) | 30.7 | 48.4 | 19.4 | 0.00 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 62 |
79.0 | 19.4 | 1.6 | ||||||
The cases built knowledge that I’ll remember (survey B) | 14.7 | 44.1 | 25.0 | 10.3 | 5.9 | 0.0 | 68 | |
58.8 | 35.3 | 5.9 | ||||||
Team-work / collaboration | The cases resulted in in-depth discussion with my colleagues (survey B) | 23.7 | 57.6 | 11.9 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 69 |
81.4 | 18.6 | 0.0 | ||||||
The process of discussing an answer in a team had a positive impact on my learning* (survey A) | 32.7 | 46.3 | 19.5 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 118 | |
75.5 | 23.4 | 2.1 | ||||||
I was able to participate and make my voice heard in the group activities* (survey A) | 40.8 | 42.6 | 11.7 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 118 | |
83.5 | 13.4 | 1.8 | ||||||
Motivating and engaging learning | I found the cases to be stimulating and engaging (survey B) | 25.0 | 48.4 | 15.6 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 64 |
73.4 | 21.9 | 4.7 | ||||||
The cases required me to take responsibility for my own learning (survey B) | 26.7 | 46.7 | 18.3 | 6.7 | 1.7 | 0.00 | 60 | |
73.3 | 25.0 | 1.7 | ||||||
The tAPP was stimulating and interesting* (survey A) | 25.4 | 29.9 | 26.2 | 9.1 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 118 | |
56.2 | 36.1 | 9.2 | ||||||
This case motivated me to explore and learn more about this topic* (survey A) | 15.1 | 35.3 | 32.1 | 9.7 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 118 | |
50.1 | 40.5 | 7.3 | ||||||
The face-to-face sessions provided clarity around the key learning from the tasks (survey B) | 16.1 | 46.4 | 16.1 | 12.5 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 56 | |
62.5 | 28.6 | 8.9 |