Skip to main content

Table 5 Reliability estimates for the BGQ-C and Spearman correlations between the BGQ-C and group questionnaire scores.

From: How can learning effects be measured in Balint groups? Validation of a Balint group questionnaire in China

  

Reflection

Learning

Group dynamic

N

Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha)

α (N)

.85 (802)

.86 (800)

.70 (802)

 

Retest reliability (Spearman corrected)

rs

.70**

.68**

.43*

43

Solidarity

Total

.553***

.574***

.531***

806

 

Leader

.488***

.506***

.465***

806

 

Member

.506***

.512***

.493***

806

 

Group

.533***

.554***

.501***

806

Positive working relationship

Total

.521***

.557***

.503***

806

 

Leader

.505***

.551***

.482***

806

 

Member

.496***

.521***

.484***

806

Negative relationship

Total

-.151***

-.209***

-.152***

806

 

Leader

-.126***

-.166***

-.117***

806

 

Member

-.149***

-.200***

-.144***

806

 

Group

-.130***

-.175***

-.132***

806

  1. *p <.05, ** p <.01, *** p<.001