Table 5 Ratings of workshop’s facilitators for the online educational intervention
Statement | Mean | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Participants effectively worked in an interdisciplinary team. | 4.28 | 4.00 | 3 | 5 |
2. Participants treated team members as colleagues. | 3.72 | 4.00 | 2 | 5 |
3. There were sufficient contributions to patient care from different disciplines. | 3.33 | 3.50 | 2 | 5 |
4. Disagreements among students were handled effectively. | 3.78 | 4.00 | 2 | 5 |
5. The group was able to develop an interdisciplinary management plan. | 3.94 | 4.00 | 3 | 5 |
6. The group recognized when the team was not functioning well. | 3.89 | 4.00 | 3 | 5 |
7. The group dynamics was appropriate. | 3.22 | 3.00 | 2 | 5 |
8. There was interest and engagement of participants from all disciplines. | 3.39 | 4.00 | 2 | 5 |
9. There was effective and clear communication among participants. | 3.11 | 4.00 | 1 | 5 |
10. Interprofessional education and learning increased confidence of students in clinical decision-making. | 4.39 | 4.00 | 3 | 5 |