Skip to main content

Table 5 Student questionnaire (final version) with Cronbach’s alpha if deleted

From: Development and validation of teacher and student questionnaires measuring inhibitors of curriculum viability

 

CAID of the subscale

CAID of the questionnaire

1-Educational Program (EP)

1

The contents taught to me are relevant to the intended learning outcomes of the curriculum (e.g., doctor as a professional, leader, communicator, researcher, etc.)

.68

.80

2

The curricular content taught in my institution contributes to making students good doctors.

.67

.80

3

In my institution, the content taught to me in one course/module helps me to understand the related concepts in other courses/modules.

.67

.80

4

I am assessed according to intended learning outcomes of the course.

.82

.83

5

My institution uses multiple assessment tools for the assessment of students.

.74

.80

Cronbach alpha of the subscale

.76

2-Student requirements (SR)

6

My institution offers appropriate Information Communications Technology facilities (e.g., the Internet, computers, software, etc.) for students.

.63

.81

7

My institution has an appropriate infrastructure that supports educational activities such as lectures, PBL sessions, skill acquisition, etc.

.60

.81

8

My institution has adequate support services such as counseling, scholarships, etc. for students.

.61

.81

9

In my institution, a student’s evaluation of the assessments/examinations is considered important for making changes in them.

.61

.81

10

In my institution, students are encouraged to ask questions during teaching sessions.

.68

.82

Cronbach alpha of the subscale

.68

3-Institutional Culture (IC)

11

Students are fined if they do not adhere to institution policies.

.42

.83

12

Student attendance is strictly monitored through biometric thumb impression in my institution.

.40

.83

13

My institution provides opportunities for social interaction between students and teachers.

.36

.81

14

My institution provides interactive online discussion groups

.36

.82

Cronbach alpha of the subscale

.46

Overall internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) of the questionnaire

.83