Participants | Kc | Ka | K | Proficiency Level |
---|
1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | | Medium |
---|
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | High | |
3 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.9 | High | |
4 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.9 | | Medium |
5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | High | |
6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | High | |
7 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.8 | High | |
8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | High | |
9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | High | |
10 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | High | |
11 | 1 | 0.9 | 1 | High | |
12 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.8 | High | |
13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | High | |
14 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | | Medium |
15 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.9 | High | |
- K Expert competence coefficient (scale of 0.25 to1)
- Ka ‘coefficient of argument’ or foundation of expert opinion. It is obtained from assigning scores to a number of different sources of argument that could wield the expert
- Kc ‘coefficient of knowledge’ or information that the expert on the subject or problem posed. It is calculated from the assessment made by the expert himself on a scale of 0 to 10, multiplied by 0,1
- K = ½ (Kc + Ka)