Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

First author

Participants/Country

N (VR/control)

Course

Intervention

Comparator

Duration

Anthony, 2011 [19]

medical students/UK

12/14

anatomy of the forearm

VR

dissection and textbooks

50 min

Battulga, 2012 [20]

medical students/Japan

50/50

shoulder

3D interactive models

2D images

60 min

de Faria, 2016 [21]

medical students/Brazil

28/28

neuroanatomy

3D interactive models

2D images

60 min

Ellington, 2018 [22]

residents/UK

16/15

female pelvic anatomy

VR

power point

2 weeks

Hampton, 2010 [23]

medical students 3, 4 year /USA

21/22

female pelvic anatomy

3D interactive models

dissection and textbooks

60 min

Keedy, 2011 [24]

medical students 1, 4 year/USA

23/23

anatomy of the liver

3D interactive models

2D images

1 day

Khot, 2013 [25]

medical students/Canada

20/20

pelvic anatomy

VR

power point

10 min

Kockro, 2015 [26]

medical students/Germany

89/80

spatial neuroanatomy

3D interactive models

power point

20 min

Moro, 2017 [27]

medical students/Australia

20/22

skull anatomy

VR

3D models

10 min

Nicholson, 2004 [28]

medical students 1 year /USA

29/28

ear anatomy

3D interactive models

text books

2 day

Seixas, 2010 [29]

surgical trainees/USA

5/5

human anatomy

VR

2D images

1 day

Solyar, 2008 [30]

medical student/USA

7/8

paranasal sinuses

VR

textbooks

60 min

Stepan, 2017 [31]

medical students 1,2 year /USA

33/33

neuroanatomy

VR

text books

1 day

Tan, 2012 [32]

residents/ Canada

21/19

laryngeal anatomy

3D interactive models

text books

45 min

Zachary, 2015 [33]

medical students/USA

41/32

neuroanatomy

3D interactive models

2D images and 3D models

65 min