Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors related to students’ satisfaction with their experience of health service

From: A governmental program to encourage medical students to deliver primary prevention: experiment and evaluation in a French faculty of medicine

 

Unsatisfied students (n = 157, 46%)

Satisfied students (n = 184, 54%)

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

N (%)

N (%)

OR raw [IC95%]

OR adjusted [IC95%]

Gender (Missing data = 5)

Male

55 (16.1)

50 (14.7)

0.7 [0.4–1.1]*

0.8 [0.5–1.3]

Female

102 (30.0)

134 (39.3)

ref

 

E-learning participation

Yes

94 (27.6)

122 (35.8)

1.3 [0.8–2.0]

 

No

63 (18.5)

62 (18.2)

ref

 

Place of intervention

Middle School

8 (2.3)

5 (1.5)

0.3 [0.1–0.9]*

0.6 [0.2–2.4]

High school

44 (12.9)

99 (29.0)

ref

Ref

Universities

99 (29.0)

60 (17.6)

0.3 [0.2–0.4] *

0.5 [0.3–0.8]

Social structure

6 (1.8)

20 (5.9)

1.5 [0.6–3.9]*

1.7 [0.6–5.0]

Intervention theme

Nutrition

38 (11.1)

41 (12.0)

Ref

Physical activity

33 (9.7)

35 (10.3)

1.0 [0.5–1.9]

Addiction

40 (11.7)

48 (14.1)

1.1 [0.6–2.0]

Sexuality

46 (13.5)

60 (17.6)

1.2 [0.7–2.2]

Number of beneficiaries per week

  < 10

29 (8.5)

4 (1.2)

0.2 [0.1–0.6]*

0.3 [0.1–0.8]

10–50

65 (19.1)

43 (12.6)

ref

ref

50–150

41 (12.0)

96 (28.1)

3.5 [2.1–6.0]*

2.7 [1.5–4.8]

150–300

18 (5.3)

39 (11.4)

3.3 [1.7–6.4]*

2.0 [0.9–4.4]

  > 300

4 (1.2)

2 (0.6)

0.8 [0.1–4.3]

0.5 [0.1–3.1]

 

Med (Q1-Q3)

Med (Q1-Q3)

OR raw [IC95%]

OR adjusted [IC95%]

Mean hours of personal work

5 (3–7)

5 (3–8)

1.1 [1.0–1.1]*

1.0 [1.0–1.0]

  1. *p value < 0.20, variables with p < 0.20 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis