Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive Statistics of Responses to the Reduced SEEQ by Degree of Overall Student Satisfaction

From: Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic

SEEQ item

Overall Mean (SD), N = 662

HSG Mean (SD), N = 543

LSG Mean (SD), N = 119

MD (95% CI)

p - Value

*Learning

 4 I have found this CBD session intellectually challenging and stimulating.

4.08 (0.863)

4.30 (0.629)

3.08 (1.062)

1.218 (1.074–1.362)

<0.001

 5 I have learned and understood the subject materials of this CBD.

4.12 (0.836)

4.35 (0.588)

3.09 (1.008)

1.257 (1.122–1.393)

<0.001

 6 My interest and motivation in learning have increased as a consequence of this CBD session.

4.04 (0.934)

4.29 (0.684)

2.89 (1.056)

1.398 (1.247–1.550)

<0.001

 7 The faculty member covered the stated objectives for this CBD session.

4.162 (0.821)

4.354 (0.654)

3.286 (0.931)

1.067 (0.926–1.209)

<0.001

*Enthusiasm

 8 The faculty member was enthusiastic (excited) about teaching this CBD session.

4.17 (0.852)

4.38 (0.620)

3.18 (1.057)

1.196 (1.054–1.339)

<0.001

 9 The faculty member was dynamic (style of presentation holds your interest) and energetic during this CBD session.

4.08 (0.949)

4.35 (0.659)

2.86 (1.099)

1.493 (1.342–1.643)

<0.001

*Organization

 10 The faculty member’s explanations were clear.

4.20 (0.851)

4.43 (0.603)

3.15 (1.022)

1.276 (1.138–1.414)

<0.001

 11 The CBD material was well prepared and carefully explained.

4.10 (0.908)

4.35 (0.624)

2.97 (1.119)

1.380 (1.233–1.526)

<0.001

 12 The faculty member gave a CBD session that facilitated taking notes.

4.06 (0.917)

3.00 (1.112)

3.00 (1.112)

1.289 (1.136–1.443)

<0.001

*Group interaction

 13 Students were encouraged to participate in this CBD session.

4.23 (0.781)

4.40 (0.586)

3.47 (1.064)

0.925 (0.787–1.064)

<0.001

 14 Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge.

4.19 (0.829)

4.37 (0.617)

3.34 (1.108)

1.026 (0.881–1.171)

<0.001

 15 Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers.

4.18 (0.819)

4.35 (0.642)

3.43 (1.078)

0.919 (0.773–1.066)

<0.001

*Individual rapport

 16 The faculty member made the students feel welcome in seeking help/advice regarding learning challenges during COVID-19.

4.04 (0.944)

4.26 (0.749)

3.06 (1.107)

1.199 (1.035–1.363)

<0.001

 17 The faculty member had a genuine (sincere) interest in students.

4.08 (0.874)

4.29 (0.674)

3.13 (1.030)

1.167 (1.018–1.316)

<0.001

*Technology

 18 The faculty member was creative (used whiteboard, chat room, videos, web materials, etc.).

3.95 (0.996)

4.15 (0.838)

3.03 (1.134)

1.121 (0.942–1.300)

<0.001

 19 During this CBD session, there were technical issues (audio/visual).

2.82 (1.355)

2.85 (1.389)

2.67 (1.180)

0.177 (-0.092–0.446)

0.198

*Satisfaction

 20 Overall, I was highly satisfied with this CBD session.

4.10 (0.883)

4.44 (0.496)

2.59 (0.643)

1.848 (1.744–1.953)

<0.001

21 Do you have any comments ?

“Dr. X was very enthusiastic during teaching. It was a very beneficial CBD”.

“One of the most beneficial CBDs I took this year”.

“I couldn’t ask all my questions, Dr. X immediately logged off the app and didn’t wait to see if we had questions”

“Was a good experience with Dr. X but she took so long around 3hours, overall she was a really good tutor”

“Dr. X was very helpful and encouraging”.

“Dr. X is a good example of how a doctor should encourage her students to be strong and to study hard. She has a good method of delivering the information to the students in an easy way”.

  1. SD Standard deviation, N Number of students, HSG High satisfaction group, LSG Low satisfaction group, MD Mean difference CI Confidence interval.