From: Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic
SEEQ item | Overall Mean (SD), N = 662 | HSG Mean (SD), N = 543 | LSG Mean (SD), N = 119 | MD (95% CI) | p - Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
*Learning | |||||
4 I have found this CBD session intellectually challenging and stimulating. | 4.08 (0.863) | 4.30 (0.629) | 3.08 (1.062) | 1.218 (1.074–1.362) | <0.001 |
5 I have learned and understood the subject materials of this CBD. | 4.12 (0.836) | 4.35 (0.588) | 3.09 (1.008) | 1.257 (1.122–1.393) | <0.001 |
6 My interest and motivation in learning have increased as a consequence of this CBD session. | 4.04 (0.934) | 4.29 (0.684) | 2.89 (1.056) | 1.398 (1.247–1.550) | <0.001 |
7 The faculty member covered the stated objectives for this CBD session. | 4.162 (0.821) | 4.354 (0.654) | 3.286 (0.931) | 1.067 (0.926–1.209) | <0.001 |
*Enthusiasm | |||||
8 The faculty member was enthusiastic (excited) about teaching this CBD session. | 4.17 (0.852) | 4.38 (0.620) | 3.18 (1.057) | 1.196 (1.054–1.339) | <0.001 |
9 The faculty member was dynamic (style of presentation holds your interest) and energetic during this CBD session. | 4.08 (0.949) | 4.35 (0.659) | 2.86 (1.099) | 1.493 (1.342–1.643) | <0.001 |
*Organization | |||||
10 The faculty member’s explanations were clear. | 4.20 (0.851) | 4.43 (0.603) | 3.15 (1.022) | 1.276 (1.138–1.414) | <0.001 |
11 The CBD material was well prepared and carefully explained. | 4.10 (0.908) | 4.35 (0.624) | 2.97 (1.119) | 1.380 (1.233–1.526) | <0.001 |
12 The faculty member gave a CBD session that facilitated taking notes. | 4.06 (0.917) | 3.00 (1.112) | 3.00 (1.112) | 1.289 (1.136–1.443) | <0.001 |
*Group interaction | |||||
13 Students were encouraged to participate in this CBD session. | 4.23 (0.781) | 4.40 (0.586) | 3.47 (1.064) | 0.925 (0.787–1.064) | <0.001 |
14 Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge. | 4.19 (0.829) | 4.37 (0.617) | 3.34 (1.108) | 1.026 (0.881–1.171) | <0.001 |
15 Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers. | 4.18 (0.819) | 4.35 (0.642) | 3.43 (1.078) | 0.919 (0.773–1.066) | <0.001 |
*Individual rapport | |||||
16 The faculty member made the students feel welcome in seeking help/advice regarding learning challenges during COVID-19. | 4.04 (0.944) | 4.26 (0.749) | 3.06 (1.107) | 1.199 (1.035–1.363) | <0.001 |
17 The faculty member had a genuine (sincere) interest in students. | 4.08 (0.874) | 4.29 (0.674) | 3.13 (1.030) | 1.167 (1.018–1.316) | <0.001 |
*Technology | |||||
18 The faculty member was creative (used whiteboard, chat room, videos, web materials, etc.). | 3.95 (0.996) | 4.15 (0.838) | 3.03 (1.134) | 1.121 (0.942–1.300) | <0.001 |
19 During this CBD session, there were technical issues (audio/visual). | 2.82 (1.355) | 2.85 (1.389) | 2.67 (1.180) | 0.177 (-0.092–0.446) | 0.198 |
*Satisfaction | |||||
20 Overall, I was highly satisfied with this CBD session. | 4.10 (0.883) | 4.44 (0.496) | 2.59 (0.643) | 1.848 (1.744–1.953) | <0.001 |
21 Do you have any comments ? “Dr. X was very enthusiastic during teaching. It was a very beneficial CBD”. “One of the most beneficial CBDs I took this year”. “I couldn’t ask all my questions, Dr. X immediately logged off the app and didn’t wait to see if we had questions” “Was a good experience with Dr. X but she took so long around 3hours, overall she was a really good tutor” “Dr. X was very helpful and encouraging”. “Dr. X is a good example of how a doctor should encourage her students to be strong and to study hard. She has a good method of delivering the information to the students in an easy way”. |