Skip to main content

Table 3 The comparison of perspectives and self-perceived competence in the PBL–CBL group vs. the traditional group (for all participants)

From: The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease

Item

PBL–CBL group (N = 276)

Traditional group (N = 293)

T

95% confidence interval

P value

Learning motivation (point)

4.03 ± 0.813

3.06 ± 0.844

13.977

0.835,1.107

<0.001

Understanding (point)

4.05 ± 0.812

2.94 ± 0.836

16.048

0.978,1.244

<0.001

Student–teacher interaction (point)

3.98 ± 0.786

3.02 ± 0.794

14.460

0.828,1.088

<0.001

Free time consumed (point)

2.07 ± 0.838

2.94 ± 0.825

14.481

0.874,1.148

<0.001

Final examination (point)

4.01 ± 0.788

3.05 ± 0.801

14.352

0.825,1.087

<0.001

Communication skills (point)

4.00 ± 0.825

2.49 ± 0.501

26.305

1.402,1.629

<0.001

Clinical thinking skills (point)

4.01 ± 0.822

2.48 ± 0.501

26.671

1.422,1.646

<0.001

Self-learning skills (point)

3.98 ± 0.824

2.58 ± 0.495

24.465

1.292,1.646

<0.001

Teamwork skills (point)

4.02 ± 0.802

2.58 ± 0.494

25.559

1.327,1.548

<0.001

Knowledge absorption (point)

4.02 ± 0.807

2.46 ± 0.499

27.560

1.449,1.672

<0.001