Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation between several possible determinants of students’ global satisfaction with electives

From: Electives in the medical curriculum – an opportunity to achieve students’ satisfaction?

 

Gender

Age (year)

Grade

Agrees with assessment methodology

Perception of workload

Attendance

Agrees with teaching methodology

Score NASA

Frequency of study > 0

Number of students in 2015/2016 (N.x/100)

Order of preference in 2015/2016

(V1.x)

Gender

1

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Polychoric Correlation

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Polychoric Correlation

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Age (year)

−0.206 *

1

Pearson

Point Bi-serial

Pearson

Pearson

Pearson

Pearson

Point Bi-serial

Pearson

Pearson

Grade

(0–20)

− 0.128 *

− 0.010 *

1

Point Bi-serial

Pearson

Pearson

Pearson

Pearson

Point Bi-serial

Pearson

Pearson

Agrees with assessment methodology

0.027

0.027 *

0.469

1

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Polychoric Correlation

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Perception of workload

(5–25)

0.063

0.028 *

−0.407

− 0.499

1

Pearson

Pearson

Pearson

Point Bi-serial

Pearson

Pearson

Attendance

−0.159 *

−0.032 *

0.134

−0.030 *

− 0.026 *

1

Pearson

Pearson

Point Bi-serial

Pearson

Pearson

Agrees with teaching methodology

0.076

0.016 *

0.132

0.366

−0.146

− 0.067 *

1

Pearson

Point Bi-serial

Pearson

Pearson

Score NASA

(1–10)

−0.009

−0.025 *

− 0.211

−0.315

0.573

0.064 *

−0.097

1

Point Bi-serial

Pearson

Pearson

Frequency of study > 0

−0.113

0.091

−0.133

−0.115 *

0.344

0.076 *

−0.046 *

0.350

1

Point Bi-serial

Point Bi-serial

Number of students in 2015/2016 (N.x/100)

−0.057

−0.078 *

0.380

0.330

−0.326

0.058 *

0.178

−0.128

−0.244

1

Pearson

Order of preference in 2015/2016

(V1.x)

0.060

0.063 *

−0.194

−0.033 *

0.215

0.084 *

−0.003 *

0.172

0.153

−0.274

1

  1. * p < 0.05