Skip to main content

Table 4 serial evaluation of participants’ confidence about core competency (CC) education (n = 28 in each group)

From: Sustained effects of faculty leadership development modules for clinical instructors of core competences education in Taiwan: a four-year explanatory case study

Questions

regular FD module participants

intervention FD module participants

I feel confident about … …

pre-

module

end-of-module (Δ% from pre-module)

Follow-up (Δ% from pre-module)

pre-

module

end-of-module (Δ% from pre-module)

Follow-up (Δ% from pre-module)

1. delivering CC-based teachings

3.1 ± 0.5

3.9 ± 0.4 (26%)

3.8 ± 0.3 (23%)

3.4 ± 0.2

4.8 ± 0.3 (41%)*

#2.3

4.7 ± 0.5 (38%)*

#3

2. delivering CC-based assessments

2.9 ± 0.2

3.3 ± 0.7 (14%)

3 ± 0.6 (3%)

3.1 ± 0.4

3.7 ± 0.2 (19%)

3.9 ± 0.5 (26%)*

#1.5

3.designing CC-based teachings

2.2 ± 0.6

2.8 ± 0.4 (27%)

2.7 ± 0.3 (23%)

2.7 ± 0.8

3.4 ± 0.3 (26%)

3.8 ± 0.2 (41%)*

#3.67

4.designing CC-based assessments

2.3 ± 0.4

2.9 ± 0.5 (26%)

3.1 ± 0.2 (35%)

2.8 ± 0.6

3.6 ± 0.3 (29%)

4.1 ± 0.4 (46%)*

#2.4

5.leading CC-based teachings

2.4 ± 0.5

3.1 ± 0.2 (29%)

3.4 ± 0.6 (42%)

2.5 ± 0.7

4.0 ± 0.5 (60%)*

#4.5

4.1 ± 0.3 (64%)*

#1.17

6 leading CC-based assessments

1.9 ± 0.3

2.6 ± 0.4 (37%)

2.4 ± 0.2 (26%)

2.3 ± 0.5

3.8 ± 0.5 (65%)*

#3

3.9 ± 0.2 (70%)*

#7.5

  1. Data were expressed as mean ± SD; agreement to questions are rated by 5-point Likert scale; 5 = very agree; 3 = neutral; 1 = very not agree; *, p < 0.05 vs. corresponding data of regular FD group that analyzed using student t test; Comparison among data of multiple time points were analyzed with ANOVA test; # t-test’s effect size for compared data between groups that with significance on t test