Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 2 Participant Perceptions from the Peer Review Process

From: Remote assessment via video evaluation (RAVVE): a pilot study to trial video-enabled peer feedback on clinical performance

 MeanMedianS.D.MinMax
1. Informative4.040.7135
2. Meaningful3.641.1425
3. Comprehensive3.640.5534
4. Credible4.650.5545
5. Anxiety provoking2.821.1024
6. Frustrating2.420.8924
7. Constructive3.840.4534
8. Useful4.040.0044
9. Communicated effectively4.040.0044
10. Idea generating4.240.8435
11. Likely to improve my practice3.641.1425
12. Motivating4.040.7135
13. Sufficient3.640.5534
14. Appropriate3.841.1025
15. Fair4.040.7135
16. Accurate3.840.4534
17. Valuable4.240.8435
18. Clear4.040.0044