Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options

Original Submission
29 May 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lambert Schuwirth
28 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacob Pearce
25 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Mike Tweed
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Aug 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacob Pearce
1 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Mike Tweed
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Sep 2019 Editorially accepted
14 Sep 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12909-019-1801-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page