Table 1 Balanced, consensus-based peer asessment system
Level team member | Description | Marksa |
|---|---|---|
Outstanding | Met all of their own requirements and have demonstrated evidence of leadership and team working skills far beyond what was expected | 6 |
Very good | Met all of their own requirements and covering extra work beyond what was expected | 5 |
Essential | Met all of their own requirements (perhaps after renegotiation of tasks) | 4 |
Adequate | Covered most of the agreed tasks during the team work project | 3 |
Underperforming | Covered some of the agreed tasks | 2 |
Largely underperforming | Failed to meet agreed tasks and who have consistently failed to comply with the set team rules. | 1 |
Free rider | No contribution to the team | 0 |