Table 2 Characteristics of the participants
Gender | Father′s educational level | Mother′s educational level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | Male | High school or lower | University or higher | High school or lower | University or higher | |
Traditional approach | n (percentage) | |||||
Converger | 18 (51.4) | 15 (65.2) | 15 (55.6) | 18 (58) | 17 (48.6) | 16 (69.6) |
Assimilator | 7 (20) | 5 (21.7) | 5 (18.5) | 7 (22.6) | 9 (25.7) | 3 (13) |
Accommodator | 8 (22.9) | 1 (4.3) | 5 (18.5) | 4 (12.9) | 6 (17.1) | 3 (13) |
Diverger | 2 (5.7) | 2 (8.7) | 2 (7.4) | 2 (6.5) | 3 (8.6) | 1 (4.3) |
Total | 35 (100) | 23 (100) | 27 (100) | 31 (100) | 35 (100) | 23(100) |
ICM approach | n (percentage) | |||||
Converger | 22 (61) | 12 (44.4) | 23 (60.5) | 11 (44) | 21 (53.8) | 13 (54.2) |
Assimilator | 6 (16.7) | 10 (37) | 8 (21.1) | 8 (32) | 10 (25.6) | 6 (25) |
Accommodator | 5 (13.9) | 3 (11.1) | 4 (10.5) | 4 (16) | 6 (15.4) | 2 (8.3) |
Diverger | 3 (8.3) | 2 (7.4) | 3 (7.9) | 2 (8) | 2 (5.1) | 3 (12.5) |
Total | 36 (100) | 27 (100) | 38 (100) | 25 (100) | 39 (100) | 24 (100) |