Skip to main content

Table 3 Self-evaluation of medical ethical sensitivity development

From: Role of community health service programs in navigating the medical ethical slippery slope—a 10-year retrospective study among medical students from southern China

Frequency 1–5

≥6

p-value

Graduates

 Great

11 (11.2%)

36 (40.0%)

< 0.001

 Moderate

63 (54.3%)

42 (46.7%)

0.276

 Little

40 (34.5%)

12 (13.3%)

0.001

 Total

106

90

 

Unergraduate Students

 Great

29 (34.9%)

31 (33.7%)

0.863

 Moderate

23 (27.7%)

31 (33.7%)

0.392

 Little

23 (27.7%)

14 (15.2%)

0.043

 Undecided

8 (9.6%)

16 (17.4%)

 Total

83

92

 
  1. “Great/moderate/little” indicates the respondents’ opinion that CHS had a great/moderate/little effect on their ethical sensitivity development. “Undecided” indicates that the respondents could not make a choice
  2. *Significant level: p ≤ 0 .05