Skip to main content

Table 2 Results and group differences from the video analysis

From: High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students

Item

Low-Fidelity

High-Fidelity

P-Value

Duration of examination of vital signs

7 s

7 s

 

Interval between taking vital signs and chest compression

8 s

6 s

Adressing the patient

85%

77%

Pain stimulus

77%

67%

Examination of breathing

 -not at all

5%

20%

*(p = 0.012)

 -incorrect examination

69%

62%

 

 -correct examination

26%

18%

 

Call for help

65%

61%

 

Time until start of chest compression

22 s

20s

 

Time until ventilation

62 s

61 s

 

Ventilation without equipment

29%

41%

 

Time until defibrillator patches applied

91 s

105 s

 

Heart Rhythm assessed

69%

51%

*(p = 0.021)

Rhythm assessed correctly

100%

92%

 

Continuous chest compression during rhythm assessment

31%

34%

 

Time to first defibrillation

151 s

154 s

 

Time between application of defibrillator patches to first defibrillation

59 s

59 s

 

Mean number of given shocks

2

2

 

Time between defibrillations

106 s

91 s

*(p = 0.016)

Incorrect application of medication

10%

15%

 

placement of a venous cannula

26%

39%

 

30:2 ratio compliance

87%

87%

 

Disruption of compression >10s

44%

51%

 

Guedel oropharyngeal airway used

10%

7%

 

Continuous compression during preparation of defibrillator

42%

21%

*(p = 0.017)

Pulse palpation

0%

5%

 

Intubation

2%

3%

 
  1. Significant differences are marked with*