Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Online or face-to-face instruction? A qualitative study on the electrocardiogram course at the University of Ulm to examine why students choose a particular format

Original Submission
16 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Heim
8 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Kalmey
9 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Peterzan
9 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Keis
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Kalmey
22 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Peterzan
23 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Heim
7 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Keis
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Keis
Resubmission - Version 4
4 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Keis
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1053-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page