Skip to main content

Table 6 Effects of nationality, respondent sex, sex of relative, and generation on the familial aggregation of psychologists and psychotherapists among psychology students for first-degree relatives

From: Unto the third generation: evidence for strong familial aggregation of physicians, psychologists, and psychotherapists among first-year medical and psychology students in a nationwide Austrian cohort census

Effect

b (SE)

OR [95% confidence interval]

Psychologists

 Nationality (German/other vs. Austrian)

0.32 (0.27)

1.37 [0.81–2.33]

 Respondent sex (men vs. women)

0.52 (0.58)

1.68 [0.54–5.21]

 Generation (parents vs. siblings)

1.03 (0.42)*

2.81 [1.23–6.41]

 Sex of relative (men vs. women)

−0.70 (0.62)

0.50 [0.15–1.67]

 Respondent sex (men) × generation (parents)

−0.55 (0.72)

0.58 [0.14–2.37]

 Respondent sex (men) × sex of relative (men)

0.18 (0.97)

1.20 [0.18–7.95]

 Generation (parents) × sex of relative (men)

0.08 (0.70)

1.08 [0.27–4.29]

 Respondent sex (men) × generation (parents) × sex of relative (men)

−0.27 (1.20)

0.76 [0.07-8.02]

Psychotherapists

 Nationality (German/other vs. Austrian)

0.78 (0.32)*

2.19 [1.17–4.11]

 Respondent sex (men vs. women)

−0.91 (1.15)

0.40 [0.04–3.84]

 Generation (parents vs. siblings)

1.96 (0.54)***

7.09 [2.46–20.45]

 Sex of relative (men vs. women)

−0.81 (0.95)

0.44 [0.07–2.85]

 Respondent sex (men) × generation (parents)

0.68 (1.00)

1.97 [0.28–13.99]

 Respondent sex (men) × sex of relative (men)

1.81 (0.64)**

6.08 [1.75–21.15]

 Generation (parents) × sex of relative (men)

−0.94 (1.02)

0.39 [0.05–2.89]

  1. Only non-redundant model parameters are presented here. With regards to investigated effects, only interactions of substantive interest were included in the models (see main text)
  2. Significant effects (p < .05) are printed boldface *p <. 05, **p < .01, ***p < .001