Skip to main content

Table 4 Motivational factors associated with specialty preference by gender

From: Gender difference in preference of specialty as a career choice among Japanese medical students

 

Odds ratio (95 % CI)

Gender interaction

Women

Men

p-value

Specialty preference

N = 141

N = 227

General medicine/Family medicine (Yes/No)

 Job security

2.21 (1.04–4.69)

------

0.104

 Technical & research specialty

0.29 (0.14–0.59)

------

0.022

Special Internal medicine (Yes/No)

 Technical & research specialty

2.01 (1.10–3.68)

2.28 (1.32–3.94)

0.737

Surgery (Yes/No)

 Work-life balance

0.54 (0.28–1.06)

------

0.373

 Technical & research specialty

3.41 (1.39–8.35)

2.94 (1.70–5.10)

0.732

 Personal reasons

0.18 (0.07–0.44)

0.49 (0.31–0.79)

0.276

Pediatrics (Yes/No)

 Educational experience

------

1.94 (1.16–3.25)

0.060

 Job security

------

0.52 (0.31–0.85)

0.345

 Technical & research specialty

0.44 (0.24–0.82)

0.55 (0.32–0.93)

0.616

 Personal reasons

------

1.66 (1.01–2.73)

0.207

Obstetrics & Gynecology (Yes/No)

 Educational experience

0.56 (0.29–1.07)

------

0.154

 Advice from others

1.69 (0.91–3.14)

------

0.175

 Technical & research specialty

0.44 (0.22–0.89)

------

0.512

Psychology (Yes/No)

 Job security

0.19 (0.04–0.80)

------

0.135

 Advice from others

2.45 (1.10–5.46)

------

0.067

 Work-life balance

3.01 (1.22–7.43)

1.88 (1.02–3.49)

0.537

 Personal reasons

2.06 (0.93–4.56)

------

0.571

Anesthesiology (Yes/No)

 Educational experience

0.32 (0.15–0.67)

------

0.032

 Technical & research specialty

------

1.81 (0.91–3.62)

0.412

Emergency medicine (Yes/No)

 Job security

------

0.55 (0.29–1.02)

0.070

 Advice from others

------

1.83 (1.09–3.09)

0.152

 Work-life balance

0.46 (0.23–0.90)

0.53 (0.32–0.89)

0.410

 Technical & research specialty

2.19 (0.98–4.90)

------

0.090

 Personal reasons

0.45 (0.21–0.97)

0.61 (0.38–0.98)

0.903

Orthopedics (Yes/No)

 Educational experience

0.21 (0.08–0.57)

------

0.122

 Job security

------

2.17 (0.96–4.88)

0.885

 Advice from others

2.30 (0.85–6.25)

------

0.070

 Work-life balance

4.87 (1.63–14.6)

------

0.227

  1. Yes, first and second choice. Data were adjusted for all confounding factors in Tables 1 and 3 by Binary Logistic regression analysis, and presented regarding motivational factors as the final model. Bold numbers indicate significance (p < 0.05)
  2. CI confidence interval