Skip to main content

Table 6 ANCOVA comparison of the adjusted means of the reflective writing post-test

From: The application of heterogeneous cluster grouping to reflective writing for medical humanities literature study to enhance students’ empathy, critical thinking, and reflective writing

Proficiency

Group

Adjusted mean of post-test

F

p-value

Focus & context structure

Experimental Control

3.97

0.005

0.942

3.98

Ideas

Experimental Control

5.25

21.256

0.000**

4.44

Voice & point of view

Experimental Control

4.88

12.260

0.001**

4.24

Critical thinking & representation

Experimental Control

4.74

4.157

0.045*

4.28

Depth of reflection on personal growth

Experimental Control

4.94

11.852

0.001**

4.27

Language & conventions

Experimental Control

3.49

0.346

0.558

3.58

  1. Experimental group: N = 43; comparison group: N = 43
  2. S.D. standard deviation
  3. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01