Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Reconsidering inherent requirements: a contribution to the debate from the clinical placement experience of a physiotherapy student with vision impairment

Original Submission
9 Apr 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
16 Feb 2016 Editorially accepted
27 Feb 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12909-016-0598-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page