Skip to main content

Table 1 Adapted questionnaire from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME®) guidelines

From: Technical flaws in multiple-choice questions in the access exam to medical specialties (“examen MIR”) in Spain (2009–2013)

Issues related to testwiseness

The number of correct option

One or more distractors don’t follow grammatically from the stem

One or more options are collectively exhaustive

Terms such as “never” or “always” are used in options

The correct answer is longer, more specific, or more complete than other options

A word or phrase is included in the stem and in the correct answer

The correct answer includes the most elements in common with the other options

There is lack of uniformity in the options

Some of the distractors are not plausible

Issues related to irrelevant difficulties

The item cannot be answered without looking at the options

The answer to an item is “hinged” to the answer of a related item

Negative-phrased item (“except” or “not” in the lead-in)

Terms in the options are vague (e.g., “rarely,” “usually”)

The stem or the options are tricky or unnecessarily complicated

The stem or the options include unnecessary information

The stem or the options are too complex, with more than one concept included

Options are in an illogical order

“None of the above” or “All of the above” are used as an option

Others

Orthographic or syntax errors and use of outdated terms