Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Medical Education

Fig. 3

From: Modifying Hofstee standard setting for assessments that vary in difficulty, and to determine boundaries for different levels of achievement

Fig. 3

Comparison of the outcomes for applying MH or FS/CFG to the assessments of ten different UG modules: a the percentage of candidates showing unsatisfactory performance; b the percentage marks defining the effective boundary for satisfactory performance; c the percentage of candidates showing excellent performance; d the percentage marks defining the effective boundary for excellent performance

Back to article page

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

Contact us