Skip to main content

Table 1 Faculty mentorship in students with and without informal mentors

From: The medical students’ perspective of faculty and informal mentors: a questionnaire study

 

Informal group

Faculty group

P-value

58 % (54)

42 % (39)

Students age (N = 82)

Mean (SD)

27.6 (4.1)

27.2 (3.6)

0.70

Students gender (N = 91)

Men

46 % (25)

38 % (14)

0.42

Women

54 % (29)

62 % (23)

In-person meeting w/ faculty mentor (N = 82)

Mean (SD)

1.8 (1.8)

2.4 (2.0)

0.18

Faculty mentors’ discipline (N = 91)

Family Med

19 % (10)

29 % (11)

0.26

Royal College

81 % (43)

71 % (27)

Topics Discussed with Faculty Mentor

 Academic (N = 93)

Yes

24 % (13)

38 % (15)

0.14

No

76 % (41)

62 % (24)

 Career planning (N = 89)

Yes

87 % (46)

78 % (28)

0.27

No

13 % (7)

22 % (8)

 Professional Development (N = 89)

Yes

11 % (6)

14 % (5)

0.72

No

89 % (47)

86 % (31)

 Personal (N = 89)

Yes

47 % (25)

58 % (21)

0.30

No

53 % (28)

42 % (15)

Demonstrated Attributes of Faculty Mentor (N = 78)

 General interest in the students

Yes

47 % (22)

71 % (22)

0.035

No

53 % (25)

29 % (9)

 Similar personal characteristics

Yes

45 % (21)

39 % (12)

0.60

No

55 % (26)

61 % (19)

 Good communication skills

Yes

53 % (25)

55 % (17)

0.89

No

47 % (22)

45 % (14)

 Work-life balance

Yes

36 % (17)

35 % (11)

0.95

No

64 % (30)

65 % (20)

  1. P-values were calculated using Chi-square or T-test. Of the 95 students who completed the survey, two failed to disclose the information on informal mentors (n = 93). Some of the analysis contains fewer numbers because pairwise exclusion was used to handle the missing data. The total number used in each category of analysis is indicated as the parentheses
  2. SD standard deviation