Evaluation of an international faculty development program for developing countries in Asia: the Seoul Intensive Course for Medical Educators

Table 2 Evaluation of level 1 (reaction) of the Kirkpatrick model (Post-module survey, n = 16)

Questions	Level of satisfaction (average of 8 modules, Mean ± SD)	Spearman’s rho^b
PM 1. Contents^a	3.68 ± 0.47	0.555
PM 2. Facilitators^a	3.72 ± 0.45	0.703
PM 3. Facilities^a	3.63 ± 0.48	0.810
PM 4. Materials^a	3.63 ± 0.48	0.390
PM 5. Schedule^a	3.51 ± 0.53	0.542
PM 6. Relevance to one’s needs and interests^a	3.71 ± 0.46	0.454
PM 7. Proportion of activities to lecture^a	3.52 ± 0.52	0.476
PM 8. Achievement of stated goals and objectives^a	3.55 ± 0.52	0.571
PM 9. Help to do one’s job better^a	3.66 ± 0.48	0.915^*
PM 10. Overall satisfaction^a	3.57 ± 0.50	-

^*p < 0.01
^aRating scale: 1 (Very poor) – 4 (Very good); ^bcorrelation between the rank of each module in item PM 10 (Overall satisfaction) and the rank of each module in the rest items (PM 1 – PM 9, PP 1)

ISSN: 1472-6920