Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Evaluation of level 1 (reaction) of the Kirkpatrick model (Post-module survey, n = 16)

From: Evaluation of an international faculty development program for developing countries in Asia: the Seoul Intensive Course for Medical Educators

Questions Level of satisfaction (average of 8 modules, Mean ± SD) Spearman’s rhob
PM 1. Contentsa 3.68 ± 0.47 0.555
PM 2. Facilitatorsa 3.72 ± 0.45 0.703
PM 3. Facilitiesa 3.63 ± 0.48 0.810
PM 4. Materialsa 3.63 ± 0.48 0.390
PM 5. Schedulea 3.51 ± 0.53 0.542
PM 6. Relevance to one’s needs and interestsa 3.71 ± 0.46 0.454
PM 7. Proportion of activities to lecturea 3.52 ± 0.52 0.476
PM 8. Achievement of stated goals and objectivesa 3.55 ± 0.52 0.571
PM 9. Help to do one’s job bettera 3.66 ± 0.48 0.915*
PM 10. Overall satisfactiona 3.57 ± 0.50 -
  1. *p < 0.01
  2. aRating scale: 1 (Very poor) – 4 (Very good); bcorrelation between the rank of each module in item PM 10 (Overall satisfaction) and the rank of each module in the rest items (PM 1 – PM 9, PP 1)