Skip to main content

Table 1 Students’ perception of group dynamics/learning process, their participation, and case outcomes with faculty in and out of the discussion (n = 114)

From: The perceived effects of faculty presence vs. absence on small-group learning and group dynamics: a quasi-experimental study

 

Mean score

p

 

Faculty present “In” (n = 114)

Faculty absent “Out” (n = 114)

Student perception of group dynamics and group learning process

   

The group and its membez

   

 Helped each other to express their ideas and feelings.a

4.4

4.6

0.015

 Utilized the knowledge of students in the group.a

4.5

4.7

<0.01

The members challenged each other in their efforts to sort things out.a

4.1

4.4

0.012

 Utilized the knowledge of the facilitator.a

4.2

3.5

<.001

The members depended upon the faculty leader for direction.a

3.3

2.3

<.001

The group discussion was chaotic and disorganized.a

1.4

1.6

0.06

 Faced and accepted differences of opinion expressed by members of the groupa

4.5

4.5

0.058

 Worked together efficientlya

4.6

4.6

0.67

 Moved toward its goals on the basis of consensusa

4.6

4.6

0.32

Student participation and preference

Rate your participation level.b

4.2

4.3

0.03

I felt comfortable speaking during the student discussion.a

4.6

4.6

0.49

I prefer to have faculty present during the entire discussion of this case.a

3.5

3.1

0.0008

Case content

Arrived at a reasonable management plan for this case.a

4.6

4.5

0.03

The faculty member was essential to the success of this case discussion.a

3.3

2.5

<.001

I feel I got the most I could out of the discussion of this case.a

4.3

4.1

0.67

Considered psychosocial issues in the management of this case.a

4.4

4.4

0.89

  1. aItems are on a 5 point Likert scale as follows: 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = neutral; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree.
  2. bItems are on a 5 point Likert scale as follows: 1 = Minimal; 5 = Most possible.