Mean score | p | ||
---|---|---|---|
Faculty present “In” (n = 114) | Faculty absent “Out” (n = 114) | ||
Student perception of group dynamics and group learning process | |||
The group and its membez | |||
Helped each other to express their ideas and feelings.a | 4.4 | 4.6 | 0.015 |
Utilized the knowledge of students in the group.a | 4.5 | 4.7 | <0.01 |
The members challenged each other in their efforts to sort things out.a | 4.1 | 4.4 | 0.012 |
Utilized the knowledge of the facilitator.a | 4.2 | 3.5 | <.001 |
The members depended upon the faculty leader for direction.a | 3.3 | 2.3 | <.001 |
The group discussion was chaotic and disorganized.a | 1.4 | 1.6 | 0.06 |
Faced and accepted differences of opinion expressed by members of the groupa | 4.5 | 4.5 | 0.058 |
Worked together efficientlya | 4.6 | 4.6 | 0.67 |
Moved toward its goals on the basis of consensusa | 4.6 | 4.6 | 0.32 |
Student participation and preference | |||
Rate your participation level.b | 4.2 | 4.3 | 0.03 |
I felt comfortable speaking during the student discussion.a | 4.6 | 4.6 | 0.49 |
I prefer to have faculty present during the entire discussion of this case.a | 3.5 | 3.1 | 0.0008 |
Case content | |||
Arrived at a reasonable management plan for this case.a | 4.6 | 4.5 | 0.03 |
The faculty member was essential to the success of this case discussion.a | 3.3 | 2.5 | <.001 |
I feel I got the most I could out of the discussion of this case.a | 4.3 | 4.1 | 0.67 |
Considered psychosocial issues in the management of this case.a | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.89 |