Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip van Eijndhoven |
28 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anita Laidlaw |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
3 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Cloete |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anita Laidlaw |
12 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip van Eijndhoven |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
7 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Cloete |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
20 Oct 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Cloete |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
20 Oct 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
3 Nov 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Nov 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-014-0245-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.