Skip to main content

Advertisement

Peer Review reports

From: Scientific writing: a randomized controlled trial comparing standard and on-line instruction

Original Submission
9 Jul 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic
19 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Wofford
28 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jorge Ruiz
2 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia Reynolds
14 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic
12 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Wofford
14 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jorge Ruiz
17 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia Reynolds
19 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Wofford
20 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon
Resubmission - Version 5
5 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon
Resubmission - Version 6
14 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
27 May 2009 Editorially accepted
27 May 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-9-27

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page